Worldwide assessment of the root and root canal characteristics of maxillary premolars – a multi-center CBCT cross-sectional study with meta-analysis

Published:October 26, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.10.009

 

Highlights

  • 26,400 maxillary premolars from 44 countries were analyzed regarding their root and root canal morphologies;
  • Prevalence of multiple canals was 93.5% for the 1st premolar and 49.7% for the 2nd premolar;
  • Global percentages of 3-rooted configuration was 1.8% and 0.4% for the 1st and 2nd premolars, respectively;
  • Asians had the lowest proportions of roots and root canals, while Europeans and Africans had the highest;
  • Males, older patients and 1st premolars tend to present a higher prevalence of multiple canal morphology;
  • Tooth position, voxel size, and field-of-view had no influence on the outcomes.

Abstract

Introduction

This worldwide study examined the root and root canal characteristics of maxillary premolars and explored how demographic factors impact the outcomes.

Methods

Observers from 44 countries assessed 26,400 maxillary premolars using cone-beam computed tomography and employed a standardized screening method to gather data on multiple canal morphology and 3-rooted configuration (primary outcomes), as well as secondary outcomes related to root and root canal anatomies. Demographic factors such as ethnicity, sex, and age were collected for each participant. The intra- and inter-observer tests ensured observer reliability. Primary outcomes were represented as odds ratios and untransformed proportions accompanied by 95% confidence interval (CI) forest plots. Meta-analysis compared sub-groups and identified sources of heterogeneity (α=5%).

Results

The overall prevalence of multiple canal morphology in the first premolar was 93.5% (95% CI, 93.3%-94.7%), while in the second premolar, it was 49.7% (95% CI, 44.9%-54.6%). The proportion of 3-rooted configuration was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.4%-2.1%) in the first premolar and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.3%-0.5%) in the second. Asian countries generally displayed fewer roots and root canals, while European nations showed higher counts (P<0.05). Males exhibited higher percentages and odds ratios for both outcomes in both premolars. Younger patients demonstrated lower percentages of multiple root canal morphologies (P<0.05). Factors such as tooth side, voxel size and field-of-view did not influence the outcomes (P>0.05).

Conclusions

The worldwide assessment of root and root canal characteristics of maxillary premolars has revealed a discernible influence of various factors such as tooth type, geographical region, ethnicity, sex, and age.

 

Comments