Abstract

Statement of problem

Monolithic zirconia restorations have become popular because of their excellent mechanical properties and acceptable esthetics. While the biomechanical properties of zirconia have been investigated, research into their esthetic properties is sparse. Zirconia can be colored by infiltration before sintering, although how occlusal adjustment can affect restoration color is unclear.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to analyze the color of differently characterized monolithic white and precolored zirconia specimens after standardized grinding.

Material and methods

White and precolored monolithic zirconia plates (Cercon ht) (n=36) were stained by infiltration with target colors Vita A2, A3.5, and A4. In a standardized experimental arrangement, all plates were ground in 9 steps, and the color was measured with a spectroradiometer at each step. Color differences (ΔE00) were analyzed by using regression analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the inverse prediction with confidence intervals (α=.05).

Results

Mechanical material removal had a significant effect on the color stability (P<.05) of both white and precolored monolithic zirconia. For each grinding step and each target color, the precolored groups had a significantly lower ΔE00 mean than the white groups (P<.05), except at the 20-μm step for groups W-A4 and P-A4 (P>.05). For target color A2, the difference was significant with P<.001 at all 9 grinding steps. For target color A3.5, the difference was significant with P=.003 at grinding level 20 μm, and P<.001 for all other grinding steps. For target color A4, the difference was not significant with P=.603 at grinding level 20 μm, whereas the difference was significant with P=.007 at grinding level 50 μm, and with P<.001 for all other grinding steps.

Conclusions

Precolored zirconia had less color change after grinding than white zirconia. This study established grinding depths for white and precolored zirconia corresponding to color perceptibility and acceptability thresholds.

 

Comments